Ticketline, my favourite
less-evil-than-Ticketmaster online ticket agency, have finally got added
some RSS
feeds. Though, they do seem rather flaky. In fact, the website is
currently refusing to return any data at all
to me. Hmm.
In addition to Gerardis, who produced “I, Robot,” Jeff Vintar, who
penned the screenplay to that film, was attached to pen the
“Foundation” screenplay.
I, Robot was at best an awful
film. The Foundation
film
will most likely be worse.
The first and greatest threat from court decisions in California and
Massachusetts, giving legal recognition to “gay marriage,” is that it
marks the end of democracy in America.
So says Orson Scott Card.
Shame; I enjoyed the “Ender” books.
As part of my work on
Least
Privilege for xVM, I worked on implementing
direct file mounts. The idea is that we'd modify the Solaris support in
virt-install
to use these direct mounts, instead of the more laborious older method required.
A long-standing peeve of Solaris users is that in order to mount a file system image (in particular a DVD ISO image),
it's a two-step process. This was less than ideal, as many other UNIX OS's made it simple to do: you'd just pass
the file to the mount command, along with a special option or two, and it mounts it directly.
With my putback of 6384817 Need persistent lofi based mounts and direct mount(1m) support for lofi, this is now possible (in fact, a little easier) in Solaris.
Instead of doing this:
# device=`lofiadm -a /export/solarisdvd.iso`
# mount -F hsfs $device /mnt/iso
...
# umount /mnt/iso
# lofiadm -d /export/solarisdvd.iso
it's just:
# mount -F hsfs /export/solarisdvd.iso /mnt/iso
...
# umount /export/solarisdvd.iso
Under the hood, this still uses the lofi driver, it's just automatically used at mount and unmount time. There's no need for an -o loop option as on Linux.
This is supported for most of the file systems you might need in Solaris, namely ufs, hsfs, udfs, and pcfs. This
doesn't work for ZFS, as this has its own method for mounting file system images.
I was asked a couple of times why I implemented this in the kernel at all (which meant requiring file system support via vfs_get_lofi(). This was primarily to allow non-root users to access file mounts; in fact this was
the primary motivation for implementing this feature from the point of view of the xVM work. In particular, if you have PRIV_SYS_MOUNT, you can do direct file mounts as well as normal mounts. This is important for virt-install, which we want to avoid running as root, but needs to be able to mount DVDs to grab the booting information for when installing a guest.
As always, there's more work that could be done. mount is not smart about relative paths, and should
notice (and correct) early if you try pass a relative path as the first argument. Solaris has always (rather annoyingly) required an -F option to identify what kind of file system you're mounting, which is particularly pedantic of it. Equally the lofi driver doesn't comprehend fdisk or VTOC layouts.
Tags: Xen
OpenSolaris
xVM
Sikh girl wins bangle law
battle
I’m sure there’s some legal argument that makes banning all
jewelry, religious or not, “discrimination”, but I doubt it’s a sensible
one.
I wonder if they could add a watch face to it instead.
This one for the doubters (you know who you are): Likelihood of me
being MALE is
100%
What are people’s approaches to writing Python correctly? The library
documentation basically doesn’t document the set of exceptions the
routines can throw, which makes it very difficult to catch the right
things, and do the right thing[1] (for
example). What do people
do to deal with this problem?
[1] on that note, if you’re writing a command line tool in Python,
please catch KeyboardInterrupt
and exit quietly. Drives me crazy!
It’s somewhat disappoint that Mercurial is still corrupting
repositories when you interrupt MQ
operations.
Relatively easily recoverable for me this time, thankfully. I’d still
like to see hg backup from the
OpenSolaris SCM
project get
merged upstream though :)
After some searching and asking around I didn’t find any good
explanation of the simplest way to implement plugins in Python. So, for
posterity’s sake, here’s my solution. I’m sure there’s a better way: I’d
love to hear your suggestions.
First, the requirements. The code cannot have knowledge of how the
plugins are named (.so files, .py, package dirs, etc.). I don’t want to
hard-code the list of plugins, as this defeats its dynamic nature
altogether. I have to be able to iterate across all plugins. Any user
should be able to use the module without knowing that it’s got plugins.
Finally, it’s got to be as simple as possible.
First up, we have whatever/__init__.py
:
import pkgutil
import imp
import os
plugin_path = [os.path.join(__path__[0], "plugins/")]
for loader, name, ispkg in pkgutil.iter_modules(plugin_path):
file, pathname, desc = imp.find_module(name, plugin_path)
imp.load_module(name, file, pathname, desc)
This basically uses Python’s module search to find all contents of the
plugins
sub-directory and load them. Now we have some more scaffolding
in the same directory, as whatever/whatever.py
:
plugins = []
class plugin(object):
"""Abstract plugin base class."""
...
def register_plugin(plugin)
global plugins
plugins += [ plugin ]
# utility functions to iterate across and use plugins...
Finally, each plugin looks something like this, in plugins/foo.py
:
from whatever/whatever import *
class fooplugin(plugin):
"""Concrete class for foo plugin."""
...
register_plugin(fooplugin)
Simple enough, but it took a while to work it out. Unfortunately, it
doesn’t seem possible to merge whatever.py
into __init__.py
as we
have a recursive import problem.